AI is transforming the lives of Americans, regardless of geography, occupation, or political affiliation. A January 2025 Gallup survey noted that 99% of American adults reported using at least one AI product in the past week, and 83% reported using at least four AI products in the past week. These products range from virtual assistants (e.g., Siri and Alexa) to smartphone weather forecasting apps. As such, it is important for policymakers and stakeholders to be updated on relevant AI concepts and legislative developments.
Artificial intelligence refers to “the capability of computational systems to perform tasks typically associated with human intelligence, such as learning, reasoning, problem-solving, perception, and decision-making.” In short, machines that think like humans. AI usage is on the rise, ranging from Microsoft Word’s grammar autocorrect function to complex image and video generation by Google’s Veo 3 and OpenAI’s Sora 2 software. Thus, it is important for policymakers to understand some of the terminology that is used to discuss AI-related topics (Congressional Research Service).
Furthermore, it is important to differentiate between generative AI (GenAI) and analytical AI throughout this report. GenAI processes use pre-existing media (e.g., images, audio, video, code, and text) to produce similar content. Google’s Veo 3 software falls into this category. Analytical AI, on the other hand, involves using machine learning, natural language processing and data mining techniques to interpret data, and make predictions. For example, analytical AI models are currently being used to examine human medical images (MRIs) to detect signs of cancer. By understanding distinct AI capabilities, state leaders can tailor legislation to embrace the benefits of AI implementation while protecting their constituents.
Constituents’ perceptions of AI are heavily divided, as indicated by Pew findings from Apr. 3 revealing that AI experts are more positive about the impact of AI than the public. Similarly, more recent Pew findings from Sep. 17 show that the public is overall more concerned rather than excited about the increased usage of AI in everyday life, yet at the same time recognizes the benefits of AI in areas such as heavy data analysis for weather forecasting. Analysis from Gallup surfaces concerns from the public about AI negatively reinforcing trends ranging from reduced employment opportunities to the spread of false information. Also, recent YouGov data reveals similar findings:
On the one hand, these polls reveal stark contrasts in public perceptions of AI. Yet, these polls show areas of common ground such as a desire to regulate AI and the recognition that AI has strong benefits regarding medical diagnoses and treatments. These overlapping areas might yield opportunities for lawmakers and state residents to come together to advance AI legislation.
Since the start of 2025, states and territories have introduced 252 bills that support AI innovation and development. This points to AI being a primary concern for state and territory legislators regardless of political affiliation or geography. There are different trends and themes that emerge from AI legislation, including AI usage in healthcare, higher education research, judicial legal review, data sharing, manufacturing, and cybersecurity.
In addition, 19 state legislative bills related to AI innovation and development have been enacted since 2022, when ChatGPT and other GenAI models became popularized. Notable examples include Texas S.B. 1964 (2025), which creates a regulatory structure for transparent AI use by state government entities; Louisiana H.R. 320 (2025), which promotes AI professional development in state education agencies and institutions; and Georgia S.R. 391 (2025), which establishes a Senate Study Committee on AI and Digital Currency.
While Colorado S.B. 205 (2024) was enacted last year, it is worth mentioning in this section, as it is the first state law enacted on AI and algorithmic discrimination. On Aug. 24, 2025, Colorado S.B. 4 (2025) was passed on a voice note. This bill retains the transparency aspect of S.B. 205 (2024) and eliminates requirements such as risk assessments. This bill was amended to delay the start of S.B. 205 (2024) to June 2026 and signed into law by Governor Polis on Aug. 28. In addition, Governor Stein signed North Carolina E.O. 24 (2025) on Sept. 2, which created the North Carolina AI Leadership Council to advise state agencies on AI strategy.
Regarding additional state-level updates, California Governor Newsom on Sep. 29 signed CA S.B. 53 (2025) which sets risk management and whistleblower protections for developers of advanced AI models, mandates public reporting of catastrophic risks, and forms a framework for a public AI research cloud. Newsom on Oct. 13 vetoed CA S.B. 7 (2025) and signed CA A.B. 316 (2025), CA A.B. 621 (2025), CA A.B. 853 (2025), and CA S.B. 243 (2025). On Oct. 10, CA A.B. 489 (2025) was signed. CA S.B. 524 (2025) and CA S.B. 683 (2025) were signed on Oct. 10. On Oct. 6, CA S.B. 480 (2025), CA A.B. 325 (2025), and CA S.B. 253 (2025) were signed. CA A.B. 979 (2025) was signed on Oct. 3. As of Oct. 21, these laws collectively form the strongest set of state-level AI regulations in the United States. Colorado Governor Polis convened a working group via an Oct. 13 letter to address changes to be made to CO S.B. 205 (2024), New York Governor Hochul on Oct. 16 signed NY A. 1417/S. 7882 (2025) prohibiting rental algorithms that utilize competitor data, and Wisconsin Governor Evers on Oct. 3 signed WI S.B. 33 (2025) which prohibits the distribution of AI representation of an individual with the intent to coerce said person.
Furthermore, it is crucial to understand how states and territories’ ability to enact AI policies will be impacted by federal legislation on national AI standards, as seen with the passage of the OBBBA. On May 22, the House of Representatives released the OBBBA draft text, which included a ten-year moratorium on state AI regulation. On June 5, the Senate Commerce Committee OBBBA text modified and kept this moratorium. On July 1, the Senate voted in favor of an amendment to the OBBBA that removed this moratorium, and this final version was passed in the House of Representatives and signed into law on July 4th. While the OBBBA does not include an AI moratorium, the presence of this moratorium in the draft versions of the OBBBA sparked debates on states’ ability to regulate and legislate AI. While this issue was concluded when the OBBBA was signed into law, discussions on this issue are ongoing (Route Fifty and NextGov).
On July 23, 2025, the White House released America’s AI Action Plan (AAP), which has three pillars: (I) “Accelerate AI Innovation,” (II) “Build American AI Infrastructure,” and (III) “Lead in International AI Diplomacy and Security.” The AAP is guided by three principles: (1) “American workers are central to the Trump Administration’s AI policy,” (2) “AI systems must be free from ideological bias and be designed to pursue objective truth rather than social engineering agendas,” and (3) “prevent (…) advanced technologies from being misused or stolen by malicious actors.” The AI Action Plan will significantly impact states’ cooperation with the federal government on developing AI policies.
More recently, on Aug. 26, 2025, First Lady Melania Trump announced the Presidential AI Challenge which encourages “young people and educators to create AI-based innovative solutions to community challenges while fostering AI interest and competency.” On Sep. 29, Senators Josh Hawley (R-MO), and Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) introduced an AI bill Artificial Intelligence Risk Evaluation Act of 2025. Additional federal legislative bills on AI regulation have been introduced by Ted Cruz, Rep. Jay Obernolte (R-CA), and Rep. Michael Baumgartner (R-WA-5).