Skip to content

Civility & Cooperation in the Last Frontier

State leaders across parties in Alaska are working side by side through a bipartisan coalition.

At a time when statehouses across the nation have become characterized by political rhetoric and partisan divides, a group of state lawmakers in Alaska is quietly taking a different tack and making a go at something rarely talked about in the modern political era: earnest bipartisan cooperation.

Since 2024, leadership in both Alaska’s state Senate and House have taken the road less traveled and opted to govern via a bipartisan coalition, composed of Republicans, Democrats and a handful of independents.

The move, leaders say, is driven by an interest in sidestepping social issues – subjects they deem too partisan to find agreement on – and instead focusing on priorities closer to home that they believe they can work together to fix.

The Council of State Governments recently spoke with three members of Alaska’s coalitions, each hailing from different political parties, to learn more about the move and how they’ve gone about fostering a spirit of civility and cooperation. The interviews were conducted individually, and participants’ remarks have been edited for length and clarity.

State Senate President Gary Stevens

(R-Kodiak Island & southern Kenai Peninsula)

State Rep.
Alyse Galvin

(unaffiliated-Anchorage)

State Sen.
Löki Tobin

(D-Anchorage)

Is there something about Alaska’s politics that helps make bipartisan cooperation possible?

Sen. Stevens

Alaska is a red state, definitely Republican. But every legislator, including Democrats, is a member of the National Rifle Association. So it’s a very conservative state in many ways. But we have been Democratic in the past. When we first became a state (in 1959), we had a Democratic governor, state legislature, and Congressional delegation. But what I’d say about political parties is that they’re not particularly important in Alaska. People are elected based on who they are, what their beliefs are, and the stances they’ve taken in public.


Rep. Galvin

Alaska is mostly nonpartisan, and that’s the way we like it. We just want to do what’s right for our people. We tend to lean a little libertarian and a lot independent. You know: Don’t come into our bedroom. Don’t come into our doctor’s office. And I think that might explain a lot of it.


Sen. Tobin

Alaska is a bit unique, politically-speaking. An Alaskan Democrat doesn’t necessarily resemble a Democrat you might find in the lower 48 states. And there’s a reason for that. We have a particular view set that’s based around personal privacy (which is enshrined in our constitution), self-autonomy and self-determination. We all very much believe that what you do in the privacy of your own home and on your own land is up to you, and the government shouldn’t necessarily have a lot of intersection with that. That actually builds better synergy with our Republican counterparts because we find we do have a lot in common. And I think that diversity within our party makes us stronger and gives more perspectives and voices that might not typically be heard by decision makers. I often say, half-joking, that we’re all up here because we’re not all there.

Recent years in which the Alaska legislature had active bipartisan caucuses: Senate (2007-2012) House (2016-2020) House (2019-2020) Senate (2022-present) House (2024-present)

Have there been previous instances of bipartisan cooperation in Alaska’s history?

Rep. Galvin

Over the years, we’ve seen a lot of examples of bipartisanship by the folks who came before us, which is great. And they’ve got amazing things done for our state. One example is Sarah Palin. It’s important to know how she pulled people together, standing up to the big guys in oil and gas, which was how Alaska was able to continue growing the Alaska Permanent Fund. It was huge and so important. And it was done only because a coalition came together in a way that a lot of people didn’t expect. And people, still to this day, are reading books about it. So we know how to do this. And I think Alaskans expect it.

 

Sen. Tobin

Because Alaska’s such a young state, we’re closer to our origins than many other states. And many of the fellow senators I served with were here pre-statehood. We used to serve with Sen. John Coghill (R-Fairbanks), whose father was on our constitutional delegation. And I currently serve with Sen. Lyman Hoffman, who is the longest serving state legislator. And he brings a wealth of knowledge to our body. So when I have questions about what the intent of a certain bill might be, I don’t have to comb through public records or watch old videos – I can just go talk to Sen. Hoffman and ask him, “What were you trying to accomplish when you said this?”. And that is an incredibly powerful resource to have at your fingertips.

 

Sen. Stevens

I was majority leader under our Senate President Lyda Green (R-Wasilla), who had organized a bipartisan coalition of Republicans and Democrats (from 2007 to 2008). She was the first senate president in a long time to do a bipartisan caucus, and we had a great working relationship. It all seemed very natural. Once she retired, I became senate president, and I too organized a bipartisan legislative senate majority. I came to depend a lot on two of my closest friends in the legislature – Sen. Lyman Hoffman (the longest-serving member in the history of the Alaskan legislature and the lone Democrat to caucus with Republicans from 2015-2023) and Sen. Bert Stedman (R-Southeast Alaska District). Very seldom did a day go by that we didn’t have a chance to sit down and talk about how things were going. We worked very closely together.

As the Republican governor of Alaska, Sarah Palin championed an oil tax package called Alaska’s Clear and Equitable Share (ACES), which sought to increase the share paid by oil interests, the proposal was met with resistance from lawmakers within her own party. Palin subsequently reached out to Democrats and incorporated some of their proposals in an effort to build support and get ACES enacted in 2007 – a move that made Palin wildly popular in the state, earning approval ratings as high as 93% for several months.

The Alaska Permanent Fund is a state-run investment fund, established in 1976, to manage and invest a portion of Alaska’s oil and mineral revenues. It was created to convert Alaska’s non-renewable natural resource wealth into a renewable financial resource that can provide for both current and future generations of Alaskans. The fund’s principle is non-spendable. But a portion of the fund’s investment earnings are used to pay for state government services and also to pay an annual dividend (known as the Permanent Fund Dividend) to eligible Alaskans. As of 2025, the fund’s value stands at $83 billion. 

How did the most recent pair of bipartisan caucuses come about?

Sen. Tobin

Alaska was facing some difficult budget cuts. Several of us encouraged Sen. Cathy Giessel (R-Anchorage), the majority leader, and Sen. Tom Begich (D-Anchorage), the minority leader, to sit down and have a productive conversation about the future of the state and what they saw as the responsibility of the legislative branch. Those initial conversations turned into a weekly meeting, which then turned into them getting their spouses together to enjoy a glass of wine and just talk about their beliefs in where the state should be going. Eventually, it culminated with Sen. Giessel and Sen. Begich agreeing they would enjoy caucusing together. Unfortunately, Sen. Begich chose not to run for reelection. Instead, he asked if I would be willing to step into his shoes, which I was. Sen. Giessel was adamant that she wanted to build a real coalition and ensure that we were actually governing together from a place of strength and value-based alignment versus simply just trying to hold gavels in our hands.

 

Sen. Stevens

Sen. Giessel was quite wonderful to work with. She’s a strong Republican from a very far right district. But she could see that things were not working with a single party majority in the Senate that was unwilling to compromise. If you give people advantages and do what they want, you’d expect them, in the end, to support the budget the legislature comes up with. But we were having trouble getting the votes we needed to do the things we wanted to do. So she was willing to take that step forward. And these last two years, having a bipartisan House and Senate, has really been quite remarkable the change that has taken place.

Can you elaborate on what you do or how the Alaskan legislature functions that nurtures or encourages bipartisan cooperation?

Sen. Tobin

In Alaska, because we have to travel great distances to get our capital (some lawmakers travel more than a thousand miles each way), we all kind of live in the same apartment complex that the city of Juneau built for the legislature. Additionally, because Juneau is a tourist-based economy, a lot of establishments are closed during the winter months (when the legislature is in session). The legislature – recognizing that some of our sessions go very late into the night and that it’d be nice to be able to get a fast, hot meal before getting back to whatever’s going on that evening – built a cafeteria on the second floor of the Capitol building that’s open only to legislators. There are a few tables, each of which fit about five people comfortably. But you’ll often see eight or nine chairs squished around, and people eat with their elbows in so everyone can fit together.

What I most like about the cafeteria is that it gives you an opportunity to sit with someone over a hot cup of coffee – not in front of cameras, not in front of your staff, not in front of lobbyists – and ask the question that you were burning to ask and really get to know someone who has a different perspective or a different background. For me, it has afforded me a chance to really sit with folks who I don’t typically engage with outside of the legislature and get to know them as people, to understand what their perspective is, and where they come from. It also gives them an opportunity to get to know me.

I try to have breakfast every morning with our senior leadership, who are all very far right of me. And I’ve found that the easiest way to build inroads is to tease them mercilessly about some of the votes they’ve made in the past. And I’ve found that using humor has really helped build a sense of camaraderie and connection. We all have a good time whether talking about the budget or just discussing what’s going on. It’s been incredibly effective. And it turns out that breaking bread together is a very powerful thing.

And I appreciate deeply that my caucus allows for dissent. They allow for folks to have strong opinions and to express those in a space where we know no one is recording, no one is going to walk out of the room and share it with the broader public. And for me, having that trust with people – who I may not necessarily have same political viewpoint with, but who I know they very much want me to be successful – is a core piece of this. But again there’s only 20 of us in the Senate. There’s a shared experience that this stems from. And to me, that’s how you build better civility: You recognize that people are complex. They’re three dimensional. They hold different viewpoints, and not necessarily because it’s politically expedient but because there might be something of substance that’s behind it.

 

Rep. Galvin

Alaska is small enough, population-wise, that seeing each other as human beings first comes pretty naturally to us. There’s a fair deal of listening that needs to happen on both parts. As well as an appreciation that [a colleague’s] constituency may not be the same as yours. We also try to do things together. I hosted a dinner to start the session in January. A number of us agreed to do a polar plunge together at a park in downtown Juneau. And we also have a weekly bowling league. I’ve found these kinds of events help us get out of our heads and into our humanity, which is more important than anything.

 

Sen. Stevens

Civility means dealing other people fairly and realizing you’re going to need them down the road. And I think civility is absolutely crucial. And it comes from a respect of all sides. Very early on when I was elected, I learned that you need to work with everyone. And you don’t want to make an enemy, because you may need that person the next time around. There are going to be differences of opinion – that happens in the voting process. Even in my majority caucus, they can vote the way they want. But the presiding officer can play a part by making sure that that there is respect for everyone. Everyone has a chance to speak, and nobody has the right to shut anybody down. That’s always been my approach.

Minority members in the Senate, because they’re not on sharing committees, the only time they can really talk and have an impact is on the Senate floor. So often, more time is taken when we’re on the floor so that everyone has a chance to speak. Sometimes those floor sessions go on little longer than I’d hoped. But I’ve seen when a presiding officer has tried to shut someone down, to make their speech shorter: It just simply does not work. And the dividends come back if you mistreat people.

A Senate President needs to work with the majority and the minority. We have six members in the minority, who I’ve known for years. I meet with them, probably on a weekly basis, so we’ve tried to avoid any confrontations. There’s still a difference of opinion on various things, but it’s important to make sure that everyone knows what’s going on and is kept abreast of the issues.

It does take work. It does take effort. You can’t ignore that. You’ve got to reach out to people on different sides of the aisle. And it’s really interesting to see: Once people are comfortable, they’re willing to talk and willing to be involved. And once they get talking, they often realize, “Hey, we’re all the same. We all want to do what’s best for our communities and for the state.” And I think the longer you’re in the legislature, the more you realize that we’re all in this together. And we have to work together to get the things that we need.

 

Sen. Tobin

Sen. Stevens loves the arts. And he loves them in a very tangible way. One of the things he quietly does is he supports a group of staffers who write improv skits and then put on a show at the end of the session called The Skits, where they make fun of legislators the entire time. He allows them to use his space to practice. And he protects them if any legislators get their feathers ruffled.

The Skits has become one of the largest fundraisers by the legislature. And proceeds support a local women’s shelter. We sell about 600 tickets for it. And I think the show recently celebrated its 51st anniversary — so it’s been happening a very long time. It happens at the end of April, in the city’s largest convention hall. You’re not allowed to record or share what happens with The Skits. It’s like Fight Club – everyone will deny that they were even there. Lobbyists will buy tables. And we get an exemption from our legislative ethics act, so the legislature can accept those gifts.

It’s quite fun. And one of the things I love about The Skits is you can only tease legislators. You can’t tease their families or their staff or anyone about their physical appearances. It’s all about having fun together and making fun of one another. It’s essentially an entire improv production done in three months during people’s spare time. You’ll come to the Capitol on a Saturday to do some work, and you’ll see someone running down the hallway in a dinosaur costume.

But the thing about The Skits is it’s part of the larger equation of civility. I’ve written skits with people who worked for legislators diametrically opposed to my personal beliefs. And yet, I was able to write some of the best skits with those staffers, find common ground, and build relationships.

 

Sen. Stevens

I absolutely deny having anything to do with The Skits. I love to go to them – they’re a tradition in Alaska. They’ve been going on long before I came here. I remember going before I was even in the legislature, and I was a little shocked by some of the things that happened. But they’re a lot of fun. The Skits make fun of me as they make fun of everyone else. But mostly it’s legislators, often in the House, who do foolish things, and then they get lambasted in The Skits. You do have to go there with a light heart, I guess, and not be offended by anything that happens.

But humor is important. I think it’s absolutely imperative that you maintain a sense of humor—and The Skits help us do that. They help you realize that you’re not a perfect person. Maybe you think you are. But the people who see various sides of you, they can find humor in it. And I’ve found that as a presiding officer, I try to use humor, not in a way to hurt anyone, but to lighten the mood and to bring everyone together.

In 2010, as an incumbent, Sen. Lisa Murkowski lost the Republican primary election to Joe Miller, a Tea Party candidate. Sen. Murkowski mounted a write-in campaign, which she ultimately won, becoming just the second Senate candidate in U.S. history (the other was Strom Thurmond in 1954) to win via a write-in campaign. 

Alaska is one of two states that employs rank choice voting for statewide elections. What role does it play in Alaska’s bipartisan leanings?

Sen. Stevens

Ranked choice voting was introduced as a public initiative, installed and approved by the voters in Alaska in 2020. What it really means is that there are no party primaries. The public votes for the top four candidates. And whoever they are – they can be all Republicans, all Democrats, independents, or a mix – they go on to the general election. And everyone in the public votes the way they want.

As you know, what happens in most primaries – let’s say a Republican primary – folks would generally run somewhere to the right in the primary and then run to the center in the general election. So I think [ranked choice voting] is a more honest approach. And I’m pleased that we’re there now. There was an attempt to remove ranked choice voting in our last election, but it failed. So I think it’s here to stay in Alaska. And I do think it’ll lead to more moderation, even though parties aren’t particularly important in Alaska.

 

Sen. Tobin

When ranked choice voting was initially proposed, I was one of the naysayers. I originally thought it was just too big a change for the state. But what especially gave me pause was I thought it would put more progressive candidates in jeopardy. But what we’ve seen is that ranked choice voting has helped folks find more common ground and be able to really reach out into their communities to build coalitions of voters that you might not typically see otherwise.

 

Rep. Galvin

One thing that’s important to know – and that plays a role in Alaska’s adoption of ranked choice voting – is what happened with Sen. Lisa Murkowski. She famously got elected through a write-in campaign. Everyone learned how to spell Murkowski, and it worked. But I think the lesson of that election is that the Alaskans didn’t like the idea that the national parties could remove an elected official they didn’t like by running someone far to the right or far to the left against them in the primary. Interestingly, the way I came to support ranked choice voting was I saw an editorial in the local paper from someone in leadership from both the Republican and the Democratic side and both had signed on that ranked choice voting would be a disaster for the state. Well, my way of thinking was: You know what’s a disaster for our state? When people put their partisan flag above the people they’re serving. The partisan stuff just gets in the way. And it gets voters to think, “Oh, geez, you’re not really supporting me. You’re just supporting this thing over there.” So I think voters chose ranked choice voting in reaction to that inability of political parties to govern. And we’ve seen how those who use the party structure as the basis for their personal power are really threatened by rank choice voting.

Registered political party affiliations of Alaskan voters in 2025: 60% unaffiliated or independent 23% Republicans 12% Democrats

How does the bipartisan caucus function during the legislative session?

Sen. Tobin

We all agreed when we started our coalition that we would take all the social issues and push them to the wayside – because we wouldn’t find any common ground on them. Instead, we agreed we’d focus on the top tier issues that we all decided were the priorities for our caucus.

 

Sen. Stevens

Every year in January, when we establish our priorities, we do a legislator’s retreat, where we invite the governor and the administration to come speak with us. And we discuss what we accomplished last year and what we want to accomplish this year. We try to make sure that every bill goes to two committees, which gives an opportunity to work on the bill and make it better. You know, people are always saying, “My gosh, you guys take a long time to do anything.” And it’s really true. That’s just the legislative process. If you want a fast process, you have to have a dictator. But the way it works in this country is every bill gets a thorough vetting in both the House and the Senate. So when you get to the end, the bill is much better than what you thought it was at the beginning. Very seldom have I seen bills go through without any changes. And that means there’s a lot of listening to what’s going on and making sure you know what each bill entails.

So it’s always a goal of mine, when I meet weekly with my caucus, to keep them on point and to make sure we remember what we promised to do. We don’t want to get sidetracked by some bill that really has no impact or is not as important.

But there is a power dynamic. Power is important. I’ve always been in the majority during my 26 years in the legislature. And I think it’s important to be in the majority because that’s where you get things done. Being in the minority really ties your hands. It’s hard to get anything done that you want to get done. So building a majority is very important.

 

Sen. Tobin

The other thing that’s really helped our caucus is something called The Rule of Eleven, also known as the Hasketh Rule, which stipulates that no bill is allowed to move to the floor for a full vote unless we have 11 votes in the caucus. Now, we have nine Democrats and five Republicans in the caucus. So that requires us to find folks across the aisle if we want our legislation to actually get onto the floor. And we’re adamant that it has to be 11 votes in the caucus – it can’t be going to the minority party and trying to whip up votes there. It has to be from among those who agreed to govern together.

It has been contentious at times. But I also think it has really saved us from getting into spaces where we know that we have deep disagreements that could fracture us.

 

Sen. Tobin

When I sit in caucus meetings, I’m sure my colleagues would tell you that I’m a bit of a cheerleader. I am very positive. And I try to find common ground. Even as a freshman legislator, I’ve become one of our chief negotiators with the executive branch and the House, and I think a lot of it has to do with the approach that I take. I’m a bit of a policy wonk, so I tend to focus on what the research actually says and not necessarily the partisan interpretations of data. And I think that makes it easier to talk to me.

 

Rep. Galvin

Building that consensus is really important. If there’s strong enough cohesion in the middle, then I think it’s much more likely that a bill will last. And I think that helps us to find that common ground, knowing that we have to respect one another if we want to get something done.

Aside from the absence of party primaries, what other impacts did ranked choice voting have on elections in Alaska?

Rep. Galvin

Before ranked choice voting, it used to be candidates were instructed to go to specific houses – you know the ones identified by your party as super voters. And you were told that you only had so much time and that going to other houses was a waste of your time. Blah, blah, blah. Well, here’s the thing with ranked choice voting: Candidates are now being told to go to more doors, not just those who’ve been identified as representing what you stand for. And what they’re finding is that party isn’t all the important. The electorate just wants to see people working together. It’s an important lesson for all of us. We get driven down these roads of partisanship because of very loud people who are just out for attention. But that’s not where our hearts lie. We just want to enjoy our families, worry about what’s for dinner, and maybe get out to the mountains once in a while.

 

Sen. Tobin

After ranked choice voting was in effect, what you saw were folks really reaching out to audiences that they typically didn’t talk to. We have small pockets of very progressive voters in our main cities, such as Anchorage, Fairbanks and Juneau. And we had folks who typically would stay on the outskirts of town, which tends to be a little bit more conservative, actually start really trying to find inroads to the urban centers and find common ground with them. Unfortunately, I think the political parties have gotten caught up in this litmus test where you have to agree or believe in something based solely on the fact that you have a party letter next to your name – and we see this even in Alaska.

Any tips for other legislators who might want to emulate what’s happening in Alaska?

Rep. Galvin

It’s basically: Don’t prejudge. Know that most legislators are there for the same reasons you are – to serve their constituents in the best way they can. Get to know them as a person first. There’s something to love in every single person. Find that string first. And then find out what they’re trying to do and who they’re trying to please. And then you can find those spots in the middle.

 

Sen. Tobin

I have three rules I abide by: practice relentless positivity, true inclusion, and radical kindness.

Relentless positivity: It’s easy to get frustrated and to read intent into what people say. So we need to remind ourselves that just because someone’s words impacted you a certain way doesn’t mean that’s what they intended you to feel.

True inclusion: This means everyone has a seat at the table. I’m a big advocate that government needs to go slow and be incremental because this is how you bring more voices into the room. This is how you get different perspectives. Now, it’s very easy for me to turn to my left and find all my left-leaning advocates and engage with them. But I am doing a disservice to the public if I don’t also turn to my right and say: Where are you coming from and what is your perspective?

Radical kindness: It’s really easy to be dismissive of folks and think that they’re little devils with horns on their heads because they may say something you disagree with. But to really understand where that person is coming from, you have to be welcoming with them and you have to be open-armed.

 

Sen. Stevens

Don’t fall in love with your own legislation. I had a friend in the House who said he had a wonderful bill that he worked really hard to get passed. But he realized at the end that the only thing in the bill that was his was the title. Every word had been changed as it went along. And that’s the legislative process, you know?

But on the top of my list would be to encourage folks, particularly new folks in the legislature, to go the training sessions at CSG West (Alaska’s CSG region) and CSG’s national convention. I think it’s absolutely crucial that people have an opportunity to learn what other legislators do. I’ve enjoyed my time at all CSG’s training sessions. And I can’t recommend them enough to others.