Earlier this month, New York Governor Kathy Hochul and the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) hosted a summit in Syracuse to discuss the future of the state’s energy economy. Because New York’s climate law sets aggressive targets for decarbonizing its economy by 2050, the summit was intended as part of an effort to solicit feedback on strategies to accelerate renewable energy deployment and to explore the role of next-generation clean energy technologies. In attendance were state executive agency officials, energy industry leaders, labor groups, and global experts. From the panels and ensuing discussions, three key themes emerged.
Nuclear Power
Kicking off the event, Governor Hochul emphasized that decarbonizing New York’s economy and meeting its future energy demands would involve more than solar panels and wind turbines: “I’m so excited about this all-of-the-above approach—except for the fracking and the coal—wind and solar, geothermal, hydrogen or even splitting an atom.”
In fact, atom-splitting proved to be a major focus of the summit. Following the state’s release of a “draft blueprint” for new nuclear resources, which highlighted the potential for new nuclear energy development while also raising questions about funding, siting, waste and workforce needs, several at the summit discussed how essential nuclear power will be to New York’s future energy portfolio. The discussion covered substantial ground, from the US Department of Energy’s Gateway for Accelerated Innovation in Nuclear (GAIN) Program to New York’s Green CHIPS tax incentive legislation to microreactors being used in remote Canadian communities.
For instance, in one panel devoted to Global Perspectives on Advanced Nuclear Deployment in Other States and Nations, Marc Nichol, Executive Director of the New Nuclear Energy Institute, asserted that nuclear energy’s one advantage over every other energy source was its “energy density.” “It is superior,” Nichol said, “for land-use planning as well as [national] security planning.”
Grid-Scale Storage
A second key theme to emerge from the summit’s discussions was the critical role of developing more grid resilience and transmission capacity through grid-scale storage.
“If you love nuclear power, you should really love storage,” said Dr. William Acker, Executive Director of the New York Battery and Energy Storage Technology Consortium. Speaking as part of a panel on next-generation energy technologies, Dr. Acker emphasized the importance of grid-scale storage while echoing a recent article appearing in The Economist when he argued for storage’s importance to the state’s future economic development as well as its potential for investment: “[Energy storage] is green energy’s next trillion-dollar industry.”
Regional Collaboration
From these discussions, what quickly became clear is that discussion of storage must contend with the necessity of interstate and interregional collaboration and planning—a point made explicit by Laura Beane, North American President of Vestas: “New York needs stronger regional collaboration” on the energy front. Beane elaborated that regional collaboration must involve more than just interstate planning. It will also involve the challenging task of building up resilient supply chains at the local level: “We want local supply chains…We need a new system.”
With all the excitement surrounding New York’s future energy and economic potential, a few voices at the conference offered sober reminders about market readiness. Eric Cohen, Head of Green Economy Banking with JP Morgan Chase, reiterated the importance of “market signals”, “commercial readiness”, and “tax equity” being in place before committing major investments to energy projects. For all of this new development to take place, Cohen said, we need “thorough energy systems analysis paired with comprehensive market data and research.”
The two newly elected officers of the caucus are Illinois Sen. Laura Fine and Indiana Rep. David Abbott. Along with these two officers, the caucus has an Executive Committee of legislators to oversee and guide its work (see photo and caption). Officers and committee members are chosen for two-year terms.
“In a place like Ohio, and I imagine in many of the states represented here, we’re a little hungry, right?” Ohio Lt. Gov. Jon Husted said to legislators during the session. “We went through three decades of being kicked around pretty good because our manufacturing base got eroded, and generations of people moved out of our states.
States have the authority to steer these programs in a different direction. Avoid “low-quality training” that leads to “unemployment, under-employment or employment in poverty-wage jobs,” Jyotishi said, and make sure funding lines up with your state’s broader economic needs and aspirations.
“It has to be localized,” Husted said. “You can have goals, you can fund it, you can have expectations. But allow latitude for local delivery.”
According to Jyotishi, youth apprenticeships are a promising model for states, particularly those that offer students the chance not only to “earn and learn” in high school, but also accrue college credits prior to graduation. He pointed to Career Launch in 
“Refinancing should be foundational to how we think about public institutions, especially two-year institutions, being able to be more nimble,” LaPrad said, noting how the incentive structure rewards colleges that adapt to evolving workforce needs.
Research shows, too, that involvement in the justice system often does more harm than good when trying to reduce violence and improve behavioral health. Yet many states are responding with more punitive approaches.
How can policymakers tackle these racial disparities and obstacles related to unsolved violent crime? Bolster law enforcement’s capacity to solve violent crimes. Identify evidence-based crime prevention strategies and then invest in areas most impacted by violence. Set statewide recidivism-reduction goals. Strengthen supports for crime victims. Improve justice-related data collection, analysis and reporting.