Energy & Environment Committee Session Recap

Drought, Extreme Weather Events and Other Climate Risks & Challenges to Energy Generation and Infrastructure in the West

Disruptive and destructive impacts on infrastructure are accelerating. Depending on where you are in our nation, too much heat, freezes, flood, drought, storms with higher velocity winds, and melting permafrost is already here and likely to occur faster than traditional infrastructure planning cycles can handle. The western energy grid is at elevated risk this summer, meaning that drought and extreme heat threaten reliable power generation, and capacity shortfalls and transmission trouble are likely. To protect energy infrastructure, we must recognize that the built environment was designed for a climate that no longer exists and takes steps to build resiliency into our infrastructure.

Nationwide, more than 70 percent of the 1,100 gigawatts of U.S. power plant capacity requires cooling, and half of that supply comes from fresh surface water. All told, power plants use almost half of all the freshwater used nationwide. The operation of these water-cooled power plants can be curtailed if water levels in reservoirs, lakes, or rivers drop too low or if discharges of heated water from these plants raise water temperature too high.

Climate impacts on water infrastructure include stronger storms and flooding, sea-level rise and storm surges, more frequent and severe drought, saltwater intrusion, and degraded source water quality. These impacts pose water management challenges; for example, U.S. dams and levees need billions of dollars of repairs to make them safe for the conditions of the previous century, not current or future projected climate conditions.

Energy assets in need of defense from climate change include Generation (coal, natural gas, nuclear, geothermal, hydro, wind, and solar), Electricity Transmission and Distribution (substations, transformers, transmission lines, distribution feeders, and towers), Natural and Liquid Gas Transmission and Distribution (compressor stations and pipelines), Control Centers (electric, natural and liquid gas), and Energy Storage (pumped hydro, compressed air, battery, and hydrogen).

Planning methods are proving inadequate to defend these assets. An alternative framework for protecting assets would be to:

1) Prioritize infrastructure assets for defense based on their importance to or (in the case of failure) consequences to national security, the economy and public health.
2) Perform a predictive risk assessment on the assets, considering physical climate risks and geo-temporal climate models.
3) Include an interdependency analysis of the asset(s), which considers the affected resources (no power for hospitals, national command centers, gas stations) and the hazards created by a climate-caused failure or destruction of the asset(s).
4) Consider the resilience measures and functional adaptions needed to protect the asset(s). The framework concludes with a cost-benefit analysis to guide decision-makers in identifying the energy infrastructure assets that must be protected first and best.

We cannot protect everything, but if asset protection, functional adaptation, and siting selections are based on what matters most, we will make the best use of scarce resources.

Resources:

Drought, Extreme Weather Events and Other Climate Risks & Challenges to Energy Generation & Infrastructure in the West​

Presenter:

Andrew Bochman
Senior Grid Strategist Idaho National Laboratory
Non-Resident Senior Fellow
Atlantic Council’s Global Energy Center

Heat Pump Technology

Today, we have various options and technologies to heat and cool our living and working environments. As we experience more heat and cold in our climate, reliable sources of heating and cooling are needed more than ever. Geothermal Heat Pumps offer a renewable, efficient option to homeowners and builders.

Geothermal heat pumps take advantage of the nearly constant temperature of the Earth to heat and cool buildings. Even though our climate changes with the seasons, a few feet below Earth’s surface, the ground temperature remains relatively constant, between 50 and 60 degrees Fahrenheit. This temperature is warmer than the air above it and cooler in the summer.

A geothermal heat pump uses this by exchanging heat with the Earth through a ground heat exchanger. The heat exchanger is a series of pipes called a loop buried in the shallow ground near the building. A fluid – usually water or a mix of water and antifreeze – circulates through the pipes to absorb or release heat within the ground.

In the winter, the heat pump removes heat from the heat exchanger and pumps it into the indoor air delivery system, moving heat from the ground to the building’s interior.

In the summer, the process is reversed, and the heat pump moves heat from the indoor air into the heat exchanger, effectively moving the heat from indoors to the ground. The heat removed from the indoor air during the summer can also be used to heat water, providing a free source of hot water.

Geothermal heat pumps have many benefits as a renewable energy source because they:

Use much less energy than conventional heating systems, since they draw heat from the ground Are more efficient when cooling your home Save energy and money Reduce air pollution Are suitable for all areas of the United States.

Presenters:

Achilles Karagiozis
Building Technologies and Science Center
Director, National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Jon Winkler
Senior Research Engineer National Renewable Energy Laboratory

The post Energy & Environment Committee Session Recap appeared first on CSG West.

Education Committee Recap

“Educator Teams”: A Collaborative Approach to Addressing Teacher Shortages

Arizona State University’s Next Education Workforce is working with schools and districts to implement “educator teams” centered around distributed expertise.Presenter Brent Maddin argues that the “one-teacher, one-classroom” model is unsustainable in light of increased vacancies and demands.Key aims of the team-based model include greater adaptability to workplace changes and reduced teacher burnout.

“What if we don’t just have a teacher shortage problem, but also a workforce design problem?” Presenter Brent Maddin led the Education Committee session with this question, sharing his assessment that issues driving the teacher shortages are not simply limited to labor supply.

Drawing from his experience as a practicing teacher and his leadership at the Next Education Workforce, Maddin painted a broader picture of the education profession itself. He emphasized its dwindling public appeal with a PDK Poll indicating 54% of parents would not like one of their children to take up teaching in public schools as a career – a majority response to this question for the first time since 1969.

Maddin illustrated a teacher workforce in crisis, highlighting a 35% decline in enrollment in teacher-preparator programs, alarming numbers leaving the field, and low student achievement in critical areas such as third-grade reading proficiency.

With 3.5 million classes staffed daily, Maddin argued that the “one-teacher, one classroom model” is unsustainable, as growing vacancies and subsequent staff demands have compounded teacher overwhelm and isolation.

Maddin proposed a vastly different approach and demonstrated the educator “teams” that Next Education Workforce has been implementing in Arizona school districts since 2018.

The team-based model involves a range of educator roles working in collaboration with one another, with primary roles including “education leaders,” “professional educators,” “community educators,” and “paraeducators.” Maddin underscored the model’s greater flexibility in response to workplace vacancies or short-term changes, and its capacity for a more personalized learning experience.

Since Fall 2019, Arizona State University and The Next Education Workforce has helped implement this model in 60 Arizona schools across 8 districts. To date, 150 educator teams serve approximately 13,000 students.

Resources:

Sustainable Financial ModelsPartnership with School Superintendent’s AssociationNext Education Workforce: All ResourcesPresenter Email: [email protected]

Presenter:

Brent Maddin, Ed.D.
Executive Director
Next Education Workforce
Arizona State University | Mary Lou
Fulton Teachers College

Addressing the Teacher Shortage Through Non-Traditional Educator Preparation

College of Southern Idaho has implemented a Non-Traditional Educator Program (CSI-NTEP), designed to meet the education workforce needs of rural districts.The program features multiple entry points and pathways regardless of education level.CSI-NTEP offers a customizable and affordable platform, accessible to students anywhere in the state.

As has been the case in many Western states, Idaho’s rural districts have experienced increased difficulty in maintaining a teacher workforce. This session focused on the College of Southern Idaho’s Non-Traditional Educator Program (CSI-NTEP), designed to assist rural districts in identifying, training, and retaining quality teachers.

In 2018 the Idaho State Board of Education adopted a flexible, performance and competency-based, INTASC-aligned model for teacher preparation. The following year, the College of Southern Idaho (CSI), a community college, was awarded a $1 million grant to operationalize its Non-Traditional Educator Program (NTEP).

The program’s target population is career changers and paraprofessionals, featuring multiple entry points and pathways regardless of education level and focusing on recruiting teachers of color to better reflect student demographics.

CSI-NTEP delivery is through the customizable TeachForward platform. Candidates are assigned a mentor, online courses can be recorded and viewed at the user’s convenience, and a third party assesses performance. CSI-NTEP intends to be affordable and accessible anywhere in Idaho.

Presenter Katie Rhodenbaugh underscored the need for a “deep partnership” with state and local leaders, community members, and school staff to establish committed buy-in. Notable partnerships include the Idaho Workforce Development Council, Idaho Commission on Hispanic Affairs, and Mission 43, which assists US Veterans with an NTEP pathway to earning teacher certification.

Additionally, CSI-NTEP has teamed with Idaho Business for Education to develop the Youth Apprenticeship Program, facilitating career training and placement for candidates aged 16- 24, while connecting apprentices to funding for needs such as childcare.

Since its inception, CSI-NTEP has grown from 18 candidates to over 100 consistently enrolling in new cohorts each semester. The program has also begun implementing pathways for federal funding after the recent designation of teaching as a federally approved apprenticeship option.

Resources:

Non-Traditional Educator Preparation Program: College of Southern IdahoPresenter Email: [email protected]

Presenter:

Katie Rhodenbaugh
Coordinator, Non-Traditional
Educator Preparation
College of Southern Idaho

Legislator Panel: Western Leaders Discuss Recent Legislation Addressing Teacher Shortage

During the final segment of the Education Committee session, a panel of Western legislators offered participants more profound insight into state policies recently enacted to address the teacher workforce.

Representative Cathy Kipp (Colorado) led the panel by discussing HB22-1220, titled “Removing Barriers to Educator Preparation.” Sponsored by Kipp and passed into law during Colorado’s 2022 legislative session, the bill creates a student educator stipend program where eligible students placed in a 16-week or 32-week academic residency may receive stipends ranging from $11,000 to $22,000.

HB22-1220 also creates an educator test stipend program to reduce financial barriers associated with required student assessment of professional competencies during the teaching licensure process.

Senator Tom Begich (Alaska) described SB 225, which he co-sponsored and introduced during the 2022 legislative session. Key components of the bill include creating a teacher registered apprenticeship program, a teacher residency program, and a paraprofessional training program.

Sen. Begich also discussed using State-Tribal Education Compacting to enhance the educator workforce among indigenous peoples of Alaska.

Representative Troy Hashimoto (Hawaii) described HB 1736, which temporarily allows licensed teachers who have retired to be employed as teachers during a state of emergency and within twelve months of their retirement.

Rep. Hashimoto also described elements of Hawaii’s state budget (HB 1600) which pertain to the teacher shortage, including $150M allocated to compensate teachers based on years of experience, and $35M for increased compensation to teachers in hard-to-fill positions, such as Special Education.

Representative Wendy McKamey introduced participants to Montana’s “Grow Your Own” program, initially implemented through HB 420 in 2019 and since expanded. The bill addresses educator recruitment and retention struggles in rural Montana and Indian Country, establishing a “grow your own” grant to strengthen the state’s teacher pipelines.

Key components of the legislation include the ability to take dual credit courses in education while in high school, to engage in work-based learning opportunities in the field of education, and collaboration with higher education institutions in developing a career pathway for education.

Panelists:

Senator Tom Begich
Alaska State Senate

Representative Cathy Kipp
Colorado House of Representatives

Representative Troy Hashimoto
Hawaii House of Representatives

Representative Wendy McKamey
Montana House of Representatives

The post Education Committee Recap appeared first on CSG West.

Canada Relations Recap

Western Association of Canadian Studies utilizes a novel approach to help those interested gain understanding of the Columbia River Treaty.

Consul General Mia Yen of the Consulate General of Canada in Seattle highlighted common areas of priority with the United States, such as security and defense, the Arctic, and the Columbia River Treaty. She also underscored the region’s critical economic drivers, such as the cruise industry and agricultural trade.

Boise State University Professor Dr. Ross Burkhart and David Hill, from the University of Lethbridge in Alberta, focused on water. Dr. Burkhart shared the role of the Western Association of Canadian Studies (WACS) in adding perspectives to discussions regarding the renegotiation of the Columbia River Treaty in which input from tribes, First Nations, and local communities living in the Columbia Basin had been absent from the original agreement.

In 2019 Canada invited three Columbia River Basin Indigenous Nations as observers. The 13th round of Canada-U.S. negotiations to modernize the Treaty took place on August 10 and 11.

David Hill urged us to consider ways to move from conflict to collaboration and cooperation on water issues. He provided, as an example, a study titled “The Future of the South Saskatchewan River Basin: Stakeholder Perspectives,” in which a group made up of nine graduate students interviewed and filmed 42 water users within the basin.

Interviewees included members of the First Nations, farmers, small business owners, land developers, persons affiliated with conversation groups, environmentalists, staff from cities, provincial government, and water districts, as well as scientists from the University of Lethbridge, the University of Calgary, and the University of Alberta.

When reviewing the videos, they discovered that these intentional conversations paired with active listening resulted in agreement upon 95% of values-based issues and only 5% disagreement, which is where negotiation could be focus.

Resource:

Water Across the Nations: A Field Course On The Columbia River Treaty.

Presenters:

Mia Yen
Consul General of Canada in Seattle,
Consulate General of Canada

Ross Burkhart
Professor
Boise State University

David Hill
Research Associate, Agriculture Research,
Transitio at University of Lethbridge

Meeting hydrogen demand requires coordinated public-and-private-sector action.

Andrew Place provided a global perspective on Zero Carbon Fuels but paired it with North American insights. Andrew is the U.S. State Climate and Energy Policy Director at Clean Air Task Force; he shared that the International Energy Agency (IEA) predicts that global hydrogen demand will increase from 90 Mt/y to 530 Mt/y by 2050.

However, costs, infrastructure development, and markets are some of the biggest challenges. The prices make competition with high-emitting fuels impossible without public policy support.

He assures that developing and deploying a sufficient volume of clean and affordable hydrogen fuels will also require leadership, oversight, and resources from the public sector.

CRC Canada Co-Chair MLA Nathan Neudorf provided a local perspective from the province of Alberta. The Government of Alberta has taken a strategic, coordinated, and collaborative approach to advance cleantech innovation, a Clean Technology Road (CTR) Map guided by the Alberta Research and Innovation Framework (ARIF), and the Climate Change Innovation and Technology Framework (CCITF) informs.

Last year a new blue hydrogen energy complex was announced with a $1.3 billion investment by Air Products, an American-based multinational corporation to be in operation by 2024.

Alberta is allocating $15M to the project, which is also expected to create 2,500 construction and engineering jobs and intends to capture 95% of its carbon emissions.

Due to its ample natural gas supply, Alberta is well suited to develop blue hydrogen production, which utilizes natural gas, carbon capture, and storage technology.

Resources:

Zero Carbon Fuels – A Global perspective with Contemporary North American insights​ Alberta Clean Technology Roadmap

Presenters:

Andrew Place
U.S. State Climate and Energy Policy
Director, Clean Air Task Force

Nathan Neudorf
MLA
Legislative Assembly of Alberta

The post Canada Relations Recap appeared first on CSG West.

Agriculture & Water Committee Recap

Drought and Other Climate Risks to Water, Agriculture, and Rangelands in the West

How and where we store water – surface water in reservoirs and groundwater in aquifers – are vital to informing effective, sustainable water use and management strategies.A systems-level understanding of where the water is going is essential. Satellite-based consumptive use maps are powerful tools but are currently under-utilized.Western water needs increased flow monitoring across irrigated systems.A complete understanding of water rights is critical.A clear understanding of water terminology is essential for good communication about water use.High variability of rangelands means there is no one approach for effective rangeland management.

Changing climate stresses water, agriculture, and rangelands in new and sustained ways. The warming weather and decreased precipitation have exacerbated invasive and noxious weeds proliferation in some areas, creating stress on rangeland ecosystems and ranching dependent upon rangeland for forage and water.

Traditional water storage – snowpack, surface water reservoirs, and groundwater aquifers are impacted. Agricultural irrigation practices can influence reservoir and aquifer water quantity and quality. For example, highly efficient pivot irrigation (90% plus water use) means less water percolates for aquifer recharge. In contrast, the least efficient crop irrigation method – flood irrigation – is highly effective for aquifer recharge.

Where surface water reservoir conservation is critical, water-efficient pivot irrigation makes sense. Where aquifer recharge is a priority, other approaches to irrigate crops – while less efficient
in consumptive use- return more water to the
aquifer. Water use and management must
therefore be conjoined with agricultural
irrigation practices.
Rangelands are changing as the climate does.
Ranchers are employing new or different
approaches to livestock grazing depending upon
the condition of the land. Rotational
grazing practices are proving effective at
protecting riparian rangeland areas and streams.
creeks and rivers. Other sites benefit most from
a “no management” approach. The ecosystem
has balance and self-correcting mechanisms to
contain potential threats – the absence of
cheatgrass and sufficient forage for livestock and
wildlife.
Local flexibility to manage climate threats is vital,
coupled with expanded use of satellite
monitoring of water and rangelands to detect –
and adapt- to conditions on the ground.

Resource:
Managing Water Quantity and Quality in
the West

The post Agriculture & Water Committee Recap appeared first on CSG West.

Department of Interior Announces Tier 2 Shortage on the Colorado River

On August 16, 2022, the Department of Interior announced the Colorado River had reached a Tier 2 shortage, triggering additional water cuts.  In June, the Bureau of Reclamation gave the seven Colorado River Basin states – Arizona, California, Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, Utah and Wyoming – until August 15th to reach a voluntary agreement on how to share the reduced water allocation of 2 to 4 million acre feet.  The deadline has passed with no agreement reached.

The Tier 2 designation means that some state’s water use will be significantly reduced further, effective January 2023.  Arizona faces a 21 percent reduction, Nevada by 8 percent and Mexico by 7%.

The full text of the announcement, with a companion water study,  may be accessed below.

https://www.doi.gov/pressreleases/interior-department-announces-actions-protect-colorado-river-system-sets-2023

https://www.usbr.gov/lc/region/g4000/24mo/2022/AUG22.pdf

CSG West has created the Colorado River Forum, comprised of appointed legislators from the seven Colorado Basin States and Mexico, to address and engage in the present challenges faced by the Colorado River Region, and its future as the life blood of western agriculture, hydropower, drinking water, recreational and environmental health.  

The Colorado River Forum will meet October 17-20, 2022 in Henderson, Nevada.   For more information, please contact Jackie Tinetti [email protected]

The post Department of Interior Announces Tier 2 Shortage on the Colorado River appeared first on CSG West.

Mental Health Awareness Month:  Recognizing Efforts to Meet Growing Challenges

As research depicts increasing challenges surrounding mental health, CSG West recognizes the timeliness of Mental Health Awareness Month. Exacerbated by the pandemic, preexisting trends have taken new shape and yielded troubling data:

In 2021, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported that for the first time, drug overdose deaths surpassed 100,000 over a 12-month period – a 28.5% increase from the previous year.Research involving 80,000 youth globally reveal depressive and anxiety symptoms doubled during the pandemic.In spring 2021, emergency department visits in the U.S. for suspected suicide attempts were 51% higher for adolescent girls compared to the same time period in 2019. 

With teens and adolescents particularly impacted, last year the U.S. Surgeon General issued an advisory about the emerging youth mental health “crisis,” while a coalition of leading pediatric experts declared a national emergency in child and adolescent mental health.

Compounding these issues, many areas are experiencing a severe behavioral workforce shortage. One in three Americans live in designated Mental Health Professional Shortage Areas, and studies highlight significant levels of burnout among healthcare professionals. 

While communities and states face steep challenges, CSG West honors our partnering organizations – as well as those beyond our network – whose continued efforts aim to mitigate these issues.

The Council of State Governments (CSG) Justice Center provides a wealth of resources and information pertaining to mental health, including upcoming events with the American Psychiatric Association Foundation (APAF), the U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness (USICH), and the U.S. Department of Justice’s Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA).

Our partners with the State Exchange on Employment & Disability (SEED) are dedicated to increasing labor force participation among individuals with disabilities, and to ensure that state legislators have the resources needed to develop policies related to disability-inclusive workforce development.

The Western Governors University recently launched its Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner (PMHNP) degree program. The program will be offered online in 40 states, with a stated mission “to address the nation’s critical shortage of mental health providers”. 

For detailed information about how state legislators can help address these current challenges, we encourage you to view the Mental Health Resource Guide for State Policymakers, published by the Council of State Governments. To inform the content of the guide, CSG formed a 19-member advisory group made up of state legislators from six states, state executive branch health officials and subject-matter experts across four focus areas in mental health policy. 

The post Mental Health Awareness Month:  Recognizing Efforts to Meet Growing Challenges appeared first on CSG West.

SLLC Files Supreme Court Brief in Waters of the United States Case

In Sackett v. EPA the U.S. Supreme Court will decide the proper test for determining when wetlands are “waters of the United States” (WOTUS). The State and Local Legal Center (SLLC) amicus brief argues that municipal water infrastructure isn’t WOTUS.

The Clean Water Act (CWA) prohibits discharging pollutants into “navigable waters,” defined as “waters of the United States” without a permit.

CWA regulations define WOTUS to include “wetlands” that are “adjacent” to traditional navigable waters and their tributaries. In Rapanos v. United States (2006) Justice Scalia and Justice Kennedy offered competing criteria for determining when a wetland is WOTUS. 

Justice Scalia, writing for four Justices, stated that “waters of the United States” extends to “relatively permanent, standing or flowing bodies of water” and to wetlands with a “continuous surface connection” to such permanent waters.

For Justice Kennedy, writing alone, if wetlands have a “significant nexus” to navigable waters they are “waters of the United States.” Kennedy’s “significant nexus” test turns on whether wetlands “either alone or in combination with similarly situated lands in the region, significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity” of navigable waters. 

In this case the Sacketts purchased a “soggy residential lot” 300 feet from Idaho’s Priest Lake. To the north of their lot, with a road in between, is a wetland that drains to a tributary that feed into a creek that flows southwest of the Sacketts’ property and empties into Priest Lake.

After obtaining permits from the county the Sacketts began backfilling the property with sand and gravel to create a stable grade. The Environmental Protection Agency issued the Sacketts a “formal administrative compliance order” explaining they were violating the CWA and that failure to comply could result in penalties of over $40,000 per day. 

Before the Ninth Circuit the Sacketts argued that the Scalia opinion controls whether their property contains wetlands. The Ninth Circuit disagreed and applied Justice Kennedy’s test.

The SLLC amicus brief, filed in support of neither party, doesn’t advocate that the Court adopt a particular test to determine whether a wetland is WOTUS. Instead, the brief argues that municipal water infrastructure which provides water supply and treatment, flood control, and stormwater management protection isn’t WOTUS.  More specifically, the SLLC brief asks the Court to exclude from WOTUS aqueducts and irrigation canals, terminal reservoirs, groundwater recharge and infiltration basins, and green infrastructure. 

The brief points out, much of this infrastructure “is in close proximity to waters that would qualify as traditionally navigable, and/or includes features that could be construed as meeting the definition of WOTUS” as promulgated by the federal government. The brief argues: “A commonsense reading of the CWA, one that looks at the Act as a whole, and its implications for traditional state control of water supply and flood control, recognizes the difference between the infrastructure that amici operate and those waters that were intended to be treated as WOTUS under the Act. Failure to recognize this difference leads to absurdities and an inability of the Act to achieve its stated purpose.”

Roderick Walston and Andre Monette of Best, Best & Krieger, wrote the SLLC amicus brief which the following national organizations joined:  National Association of Counties, National League of Cities, U.S. Conference of Mayors, International City/County Management Association, and International Municipal Lawyers Association.

The SLLC files amicus curiae briefs in support of states and local governments in the U.S. Supreme Court, conducts moot courts for attorneys arguing before the Supreme Court, and is a resource to states and local governments on the Supreme Court. CSG is a member of the SLLC. For more information, please visit https://www.statelocallc.org/.

The post SLLC Files Supreme Court Brief in Waters of the United States Case appeared first on CSG West.

State and Local Legal Center Announces Upcoming Webinars on U.S. Supreme Court Term

Our partners at the State and Local Legal Center (SLLC) are an outstanding resource for Supreme Court news & analysis. On July 14 at 2:00 pm ET, the SLLC is holding its annual Supreme Court Review webinar. Join Dan Bromberg, who wrote the SLLC amicus brief in Shurtleff v. Boston, Roman Martinez, who argued Vega v. Tekoh, and Luke McCloud, who argued Concepcion v. United States, in a discussion with Lisa Soronen of the SLLC about the most interesting and important cases for states and local governments decided this term. This webinar will be co-hosted by the National Association of Counties.

On July 19 at 12:30pm ET, join appellate advocates and state Solicitors General on for a conversation about the term’s cases and the impact that those cases could have on states and environmental law. This program will be co-hosted by the State Energy & Environmental Impact Center.

Both webinars are free and open to lawyers and non-lawyers alike. To register, please access the links below.

REGISTER: SLLC SUPREME COURT REVIEW

REGISTER: ENVIRONMENTAL LAW & THE STATES

The post <strong>State and Local Legal Center Announces Upcoming Webinars on U.S. Supreme Court Term</strong> appeared first on CSG West.

Border Legislative Conference Reconvened to Address Key Issues Facing the U.S. – Mexico Border Region

California Assemblymember Jose Medina, BLC Chair and Idaho Representative Clark Kauffman, CSG West Chair welcome members at reception

After a two-year delay caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the Border Legislative Conference (BLC) reconvened April 28 – 30 in Riverside, California, under the leadership of California Assemblymember Jose Medina.

The 33rd BLC kicked off with a welcome reception at The Mission Inn Hotel’s Oriental Courtyard. Joining Assemblymember Medina were local officials and current CSG West Officers, Idaho Representative Clark Kauffman (Chair); California Assemblymember Mike Gipson (Chair-Elect); and Oregon Senator Bill Hansell (Vice Chair).

The meeting’s first order of business was to consider and vote for a Vice Chair. Diputado Cota Muñoz was designated by the Baja California Legislature to fill that role and the members voted to confirm their choice. CSG West would like to congratulate Diputado Cota Muñoz for his election as an officer of the BLC and looks forward to working with him, including hosting next year’s BLC in Baja California. Stay tuned for meeting details in an upcoming issue of the Regional Roundup!

Among the speakers invited were Consul General of Mexico in Los Angeles, Ambassador Marcela Celorio, who previously served as Consul General in San Diego in what is often referred to as the Cali Baja Region. She introduced her concept of cross border diplomacy shaped by the persistent flow of residents from the binational community in border regions, collaboration to solve cross-border challenges, and socioeconomic connections. This diplomacy, differing from traditional diplomacy, “refers to the relations carried out jointly by the stakeholders, from both sides of the U.S.-Mexico border, towards their countries’ capitals and the rest of the world, with the aim to promote, advocate and advance the interests of a profoundly intertwined binational community.”

33rd Border Legislative Conference
The Mission Inn
Riverside, CA

Jason Wells, Chief Executive of the San Ysidro Chamber of Commerce, discussed the impacts the pandemic has had on the binational relationship. Wells shared his perspective from the world’s busiest land border crossing, where more than 106 million individual crossings and forty-eight million cars and trucks cross each year. The chamber serves as a unified voice for the businesses located at and around the San Ysidro border crossing, offering technical and marketing assistance, helping with city permits, regulations, business licensing, and economic stimulus resources.

Dr Calixto Mateos, Managing Director of the North American Development Bank (NADBank), provided an update on project eligibility adopted by their board of directors last year “to expand the Bank’s lending program to include investments in a wider variety of environmental infrastructure projects that will help tackle climate change and promote a green economy, while at the same time maintaining its dedication and attention to priority projects in the core sectors of water, wastewater and municipal solid waste.” As part of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), NADBank was established as a binational financial institution by the governments of the U.S. and Mexico to support the development and implementation of infrastructure projects, as well as to provide technical and other assistance for projects and actions that preserve, protect, or enhance the environment to advance the well-being of the people of both countries. It is capitalized by both governments and serves the communities located within 100 km north of the four U.S. border states and within 300 km south of the six Mexican border states.

A focus on movement of people and goods in the age of COVID included three perspectives. First from Elva Muñeton, Acting Executive Director of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) under the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Ms. Muñeton works in the Los Angeles Field Office and her areas of responsibility include Greater Los Angeles and Clark County, Nevada, the Los Angeles/Long Beach Seaport, the Los Angeles International Airport, other ports of entry in the region, and the Electronics-Center of Excellence and Expertise. To foster transparency and collaboration, she spends time on stakeholder engagement with the trade and airline industries, partnerships with law enforcement, and communication from the management office. She shared challenges and opportunities that the pandemic bore for CBP but also lessons learned such as the resiliency of CBP staff and systems.

Jon Barela, CEO of The Borderplex Alliance, focused on current supply chain challenges and the need for reliability. While geopolitics affect the production of and the ability to deliver goods on time to the U.S., there are opportunities to transition business and manufacturing to the border region. “Wage growth in our region was leading the nation up until the pandemic,” he said, citing unemployment rates below 2% in Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua, and at 3% in El Paso, Texas. The Borderplex Alliance is an award-winning economic development and policy advocacy organization. They are non-partisan and private sector-led with a mission of attracting jobs, hope, and opportunity to the Borderplex region, which is comprised of Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua; El Paso, Texas; and Las Cruces, New Mexico, also known as the Paso del Norte region.

BLC members

Jacqueline Reynoso, Director of Programs and Policy for the Cordova Corporation, addressed collaborative planning and national agreements between the United States and Mexico. She emphasized the need for more efficient pre-clearance processes at border crossings, noting there are thirty-two available lanes at the San Ysidro port of entry but only a limited number are operating on any given day. She also engaged with members about policy solutions to incentivize broader participation in cross border trade. In discussing the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), Reynoso proposed a list of professions which should be updated to reflect current industry needs. She emphasized that “we’re all here to build North American competitiveness.”

Chair of the Select Committee on California-Mexico Cooperation and representing the 40th senate district, California Senator Ben Hueso participated in the meeting. His district encompasses the cities of Imperial Beach, Chula Vista, National City and portions of the City of San Diego and Imperial County. He shared his intimate understanding of the environmental challenges and solutions along the shared border region. This included his journey advocating and passing legislation to protect state parks, the Salton Sea, the Tijuana River and beaches against contamination and pollution. Senator Hueso also provided information about lithium mining under the Salton Sea and potential economic opportunities stemming from its use. Reinforcing one of the meeting’s main themes, Senator Hueso emphasized binational cooperation as an essential component to address environmental concerns while growing the economy.

Participating members also evaluated post pandemic economic recovery and growth. As is usually the case, one cannot discuss economic growth singularly as it is intertwined with other considerations. This is the point Diputado Roman Cota Muñoz made as he advocated for a resolution to expedite border crossings, describing “miles and miles of vehicles that are basically parked.”  He emphasized health and environmental impacts related to urban traffic and vehicles idling at border crossings. Addressing recent border policies implemented in Texas, Diputado Cota Muñoz reported cargo delays of up to eight hours during which truckers were unable to exit their vehicles. Reiterating a point made by Jacqueline Reynoso, he also addressed the limited lane availability at border crossings, citing an estimate of $3.4 million in lost wages and production due to border wait times. Diputado Cota Muñoz closed the presentation with an optimistic goal of a 20-minute wait time at border locations.

Jaime Hurtado, who serves as the manager of the international business office at Riverside County Economic Development, shared his insight into what sets this region apart from others with foreign trade zones, with an above national average export growth expanding 11%, $90.3 Billion GDP, $80 Billion in exports (international and domestic), and a workforce of over one+ million persons. Riverside County consists of 7,200 square miles that stretch from its western border adjacent to Orange County and the Colorado River at the eastern border, adjacent to the Arizona border. It is the fourth most populated county in the state of California, approximately the size of New Jersey.

One of its fastest growing industries is logistics, with transportation corridors being a regional advantage. Riverside County has five major freeways connecting businesses to Los Angeles, San Diego, Orange County, and Arizona, as well as seventeen airports serving the county. Hurtado mentioned the need for building a plan for inclusive, sustainable growth across the region, stating one way to do this is through employing migrants’ existing skill sets, which he argues are underutilized in addressing urgent workforce needs. Mr. Hurtado appealed to policymakers to help promote more efficient immigration policies, outlining the social, political, and financial implications for both the U.S. and Mexico.

L to R: Oregon Senator Bill Hansell, CSG West Vice Chair; California Assemblymember Mike Gipson, CSG West Chair Elect; Idaho Representative Clark Kauffman, CSG West Chair; and California Assemblymember Jose Medina, BLC Chair.

L to R: Oregon Senator Bill Hansell, CSG West Vice Chair; California Assemblymember Mike Gipson, CSG West Chair Elect; Idaho Representative Clark Kauffman, CSG West Chair; and California Assemblymember Jose Medina, BLC Chair.

The last day of the meeting focused on higher education and Title 42. Mariana Barberena, Program Manager, Office of Global Initiatives at the Bi-National Center at Texas A&M International University (TAMIU), outlined her institution’s extensive partnerships. TAMIU has signed thirty-six agreements with Mexican universities and organizations to partner through research, education, leadership, and public service. Shared projects include dual degrees through the A.R. Sanchez Jr. School of Business where students who complete this program receive a degree with the seals of TAMIU and the Universidad Regionmontaña, or Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León in the Mexican state of Nuevo León. A similar effort is underway with the Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas (UAT), with follow-up meetings planned to develop these dual degrees by the Spring of 2023. Among the benefits and goals of these partnerships is to contribute to the successful development of international relationships between practitioners and government, create communication streams between U.S. and Mexican universities, and to highlight public service through specific programs geared to train or enhance the management of local and international non-profit organizations. The partnerships also aim to train, develop, and educate the next generation of leaders through diverse campus resources.

Professor Armando Vazquez-Ramos, President & CEO of the California-Mexico Studies Center, Inc., called attention to what he considers a dire need for a California and a broader U.S.-Mexico binational higher education agenda. He stated that there have been previous efforts towards this objective, such as the 100,000 Strong in the Americas Innovation Fund which was a hemispheric-wide initiative supported by the U.S. Department of State, U.S. Embassies, and Partners of the Americas with visionary companies, foundations, and education institutions working to strengthen collaboration among governments, business, and academia- all of which are critical to economies of the Americas.

Professor Vazquez-Ramos believes there is an urgent need to develop and propose new ideas in the post-pandemic era that promote a better understanding between the two countries through collaboration by scholars to strengthen and develop research, exchange programs, and teaching. For example, he has been leading Dreamers (students who qualify for the Deferred Action on Childhood Arrivals program) on a study abroad program to Mexico for the last several years. This program allows many to see members of their family still living in Mexico, while also being immersed in a comprehensive cultural and educational experience. It operates in collaboration with the Colegio de la Frontera Norte (COLEF) and is hosted by the Centro Internacional de Lenguas, Arte, y Cultura Paulo Freire (CILAC Freire) in Cuernavaca, Morelos. His ideas to advance a binational higher education agenda include establishing collaboration with the Summit of the Americas when it convenes in Los Angeles next week, promoting Mexican diaspora studies in Mexico, and developing joint policies and resources with Mexico and other Western Hemisphere nations.

The 33rd BLC could not have closed with a more salient topic than Title 42. Title 42 is a clause of the 1944 Public Health Services Law that “allows the government to prevent the introduction of individuals during certain public health emergencies.” It was implemented in March 2020 by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), restricting mobility and asylum access along the Southwest border of the U.S. On April 1, the CDC announced the policy would end May 23.

Ariel Ruiz Soto, Policy Analyst of the U.S. Immigration Policy Program as well as the Latin America and Caribbean Initiative at the Migration Policy Institute (MPI), shared updates and important considerations for states and border communities along the U.S.-Mexico border. Mr. Ruiz Soto explained that in practice Title 42 allows CBP to expel migrants it encounters without an opportunity to seek asylum within U.S. and without consequences. The unintended consequences of that policy, he argues, include rising recidivism rates since its implementation.

At the time the BLC met, a federal district judge issued a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) to stop “early implementation of the Title 42 Termination Order.” The exception being the use of expedited removal for single adult repeat crossers for which there is a pending hearing requested by several states. Mr. Ruiz Soto shared that an asylum rule pilot will become effective May 31, at which time DHS can refer cases to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) asylum officers for significantly more expeditions adjudication – either removal or granting asylum. This pilot will be gradually implemented. Mr. Ruiz Soto stated that success will depend on staffing and migrant volumes, as well as expanding access to legal assistance and representation to ensure efficiency and fairness. As of March 2021, USCIS employed 785 asylum officers and will therefore need to hire between 794 and 4,647 new officers and staff to process 75,000 – 300,000 cases annually.

Before closing the meeting, participating legislators had the opportunity to offer issues of interest to be addressed at next year’s meeting, or in the interim through virtual legislative exchanges. Diputado Cota Muñoz expressed interest in hosting the 34th gathering in Valle de Guadalupe, Baja California, which is located two hours south of San Diego and is often compared to California’s Sonoma County for its relaxed but also sophisticated atmosphere that produces 90% of all wine that comes from Mexico.

If you were able to join us in Riverside this year, we appreciate your engagement! If you did not, please consider joining us in Baja California next year. Details will be forthcoming. To our sponsors, we truly appreciate your support and participation!

The post Border Legislative Conference Reconvened to Address Key Issues Facing the U.S. – Mexico Border Region appeared first on CSG West.

CSG West Chair-Elect Gipson Convenes “It Takes a Village” Gun & Gang Violence Conference

On April 8-9, in response to recent shootings in his district, Assemblymember Mike Gipson, CSG West chair-elect, convened a conference to address gun violence and gang violence. The event was held at California State University, Dominguez Hills and included elected officials Assemblymember Mia Bonta, Los Angeles County Supervisor Holly J. Mitchell, law enforcement, gang interventionists, and community leaders.

Attendees listened to presentations from the Los Angeles County Office of Violence Prevention, Brady United, and the Los Angeles Gang Reduction & Youth Development Program (GRYD). Los Angeles Police Department staff gave a demonstration of the uncomplicated steps to assemble a ghost gun.

Assemblymember Gipson reported that 93% of recovered guns last year were ghost guns. Ghost guns consist of two components – polymer and steel – which can be bought legally by unlicensed buyers. This type of firearm can be assembled in as little as 30 minutes for roughly $400.

Attendees participated in five breakout sessions: (1) Intervention, (2) Prevention, (3) Aftercare (resources/services), (4) Jobs/Trades and Education/Programing, and (5) Healing Support for Frontline Workers. Participants shared stories, successes, communication strategies, and areas where increased support is critical.

Assemblymember Gipson ended the conference with a commitment to redouble his efforts around the ghost gun epidemic. He has authored AB 1621, which tightens ghost gun restrictions and addresses unserialized firearm components. Presently, there are four other gun reform bills on the docket: AB 1594, AB 2571, and SB 1327. Since 2015, 51 related bills have been chaptered in the California Legislature.

Assemblymember Gipson also announced that he would work with Governor Gavin Newsom to create a California State Office of Violence Prevention. Currently, these offices exist solely at the county level.

In recent weeks, the White House and the Department of Justice have released formal announcements addressing the danger of ghost guns and the steps being taken to mitigate the escalating situation.

Video highlights from “It Takes A Village: Addressing Gun and Gang Violence” can be viewed here.

The post CSG West Chair-Elect Gipson Convenes “It Takes a Village” Gun & Gang Violence Conference appeared first on CSG West.